General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · California

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera

Pico Rivera, CA · ~83 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade D.

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera: 7.8 TCR = 173% of General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera safety composite

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2021

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera injury rate improved

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera's TCR fell 1.2 from 7.5 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=14.3 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Pico Rivera, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.8 · 173% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #195/273
  • PHOTO XRC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: XRC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera averages 7.8 TCR (173% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=14.3 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=6.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera falls in its industry

3,020 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #195 safest of 273 General freight trucking, long employers in California.

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera (83 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera
Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera (83 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Freight Lines, Inc.- Pico Rivera has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.3 4.2 3 0 0
2020 12.3 4.6 4 4 0
2019 14.3 8.6 10 0 0
2018 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2017 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 7.5 6.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · CA · Pico Rivera

3,020 General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 90 employers in Pico Rivera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR XRC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LBY 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6284-YR-522 RX 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AUG 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunny Slope Trees 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Grangeville) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Stratford Shop) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Lemoore Shop) 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2886 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pico Rivera - Bld: 0444 - 15 601 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2886 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR PICO RIVERA (AK) - 15 462 FTE
NAT-TCR Windsor Healthcare Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Ridge Health and Rehabilitation Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Cartage Company Inc 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nova Infusion 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buy For Less - 3501 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Main Plant 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE SC & ASF - Bucks County 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanes Dye and Finishing 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.