Centralized administrative offices · Arizona

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix

Phoenix, AZ · ~34 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Centralized administrative offices workplace, earning a grade C.

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Centralized administrative offices BLS 0.7 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix safety composite

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix held a steady TCR band

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/16
  • PHOTO Cardinal Health 7000…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Centralized administrative offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix falls in its industry

1,475 Centralized administrative off establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 16 Centralized administrative off employers in Arizona.

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix
Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Central Life Science - Equine - Phoenix has fewer employees than the Centralized administrative offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · AZ · Phoenix

1,475 Centralized administrative offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mass General Brigham Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EATON CENTER OH 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rio Blanco, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashton Woods Arizona LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of South Carolina - Coastal Division 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 510 - Austin 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Dioxcide, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Fittings Corp. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. - Main Office 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.