Centralized administrative offices · Illinois

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark

Schaumburg, IL · ~71 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Centralized administrative offices workplace, earning a grade B.

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark: 0.4 TCR = 57% of Centralized administrative offices BLS 0.7 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark safety composite

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2018→2024

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark injury rate improved

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Schaumburg, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.4 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/68
  • PHOTO DBM Global Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DBM Global Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Life Sciences/Wellmark averages 0.4 TCR (57% of the Centralized administrative offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark TCR series: 2018=1.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Central Life Sciences/Wellmark falls in its industry

1,475 Centralized administrative off establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 68 Centralized administrative off employers in Illinois.

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark (71 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Life Sciences/Wellmark
Central Life Sciences/Wellmark (71 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Central Life Sciences/Wellmark has fewer employees than the Centralized administrative offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · IL · Schaumburg

1,475 Centralized administrative offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 246 employers in Schaumburg, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DBM Global Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renfro - Corporate Offices 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avantic Lodging Enterprises Inc 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dwight, IL 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6697_16861 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Menold Construction, Inc 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contegra Enterprises 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6354-OFFS 3,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schaumburg Community Consolidated School District No. 54 2,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nation Pizza & Foods (Schaumburg) 1,320 FTE
CITY-NEAR IL02 1,301 FTE
NAT-TCR GreenWood, Inc. - Merck 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wagner Food Equipment, Inc. - Roanoke 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR International Dioxcide, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mws Wire Industries 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allstate Construction, Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walker Tool & Die, Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacobs - Rio Rancho - OMI 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.