Electric contracting · California

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc.

Jackson, CA · ~20 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric contracting workplace, earning a grade C.

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 102% of Electric contracting BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. safety composite

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. held a steady TCR band

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=15.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Jackson, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #280/548
  • PHOTO Wasa Electrical Serv…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wasa Electrical Services, Inc. HAWAII (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (102% of the Electric contracting BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=15.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Electric contracting establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #280 safest of 548 Electric contracting employers in California.

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. (20 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc.
Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. (20 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Central Sierra Electric Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Electric contracting median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 15.4 15.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Jackson

4,550 Electric contracting employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 26 employers in Jackson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wasa Electrical Services, Inc. HAWAII 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Innovation Group - Charlotte 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR George/McKenna Electrical Contractors, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TriSmart Solar LLC 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort 981 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30286) 479 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amador County 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Amador Hospital (110-7001) 452 FTE
NAT-TCR Discher Architectural Millwork 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tejas Tubular Products - Tubing 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vpgc, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmyra Operation 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lexington District Office 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pineywoods Crew Quarters 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frederick Noland Company 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&B Industrial Services, Inc. 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.