General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload · New York

Central Transport - 132

East Syracuse, NY · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Transport - 132 runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload workplace, earning a grade C.

Central Transport - 132: 5.3 TCR = 117% of General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Transport - 132 safety composite

Central Transport - 132 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Transport - 132: 4.6 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.38× in 2024

Central Transport - 132's TCR rose 2.7 from 4.6 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · East Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 117% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #24/98
  • PHOTO R+L Carriers - CHI
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R+L Carriers - CHI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Central Transport - 132 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Transport - 132 averages 5.3 TCR (117% of the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Transport - 132 TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=9.6 · 2018=4.3 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Transport - 132 falls in its industry

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long- establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 98 General Freight Trucking Long- employers in New York.

Central Transport - 132 (22 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Transport - 132
Central Transport - 132 (22 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Transport - 132 has fewer employees than the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance L median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 7.3 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.1 6.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.4 10.4 2 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2017 9.6 9.6 2 0 0
2016 4.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · NY · East Syracuse

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 143 employers in East Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R+L Carriers - CHI 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR XCL 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BWG-ODFL 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DES-ODFL 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turek Farms Management Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Cattle LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridgecrest Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Affinity Agriculture LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Syracuse Orthopedic Specialists 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anaren Microwave, Inc 543 FTE
CITY-NEAR TTM Technologies (Anaren) 526 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol-Myers Squibb Company - East Syracuse 447 FTE
NAT-TCR Medicalodges Leavenworth 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 815 Industrial pkw. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Henning Hatchery 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kamps Newton 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 193 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 468 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas Warehouse 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaumont 6434 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.