General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload · Maryland

Central Transport - 212

Elkridge, MD · ~41 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Transport - 212 runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Transport - 212: 10.0 TCR = 222% of General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Transport - 212 safety composite

Central Transport - 212 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Central Transport - 212 injury rate improved

Central Transport - 212's TCR fell 2.0 from 8.2 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 31.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=5.1 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=31.1 · 2022=13.5 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Elkridge, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 222% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #33/41
  • PHOTO East Green Bay WI FX…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East Green Bay WI FXFE-EGB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Central Transport - 212 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Transport - 212 averages 10.0 TCR (222% of the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Transport - 212 TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=5.1 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=31.1 · 2022=13.5 · 2023=6 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Transport - 212 falls in its industry

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long- establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 41 General Freight Trucking Long- employers in Maryland.

Central Transport - 212 (41 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Transport - 212
Central Transport - 212 (41 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Transport - 212 has fewer employees than the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance L median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 6.2 4 0 0
2023 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2022 13.5 13.5 5 0 0
2021 31.1 31.1 6 0 0
2020 6.8 6.8 2 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2016 8.2 8.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · MD · Elkridge

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 90 employers in Elkridge, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East Green Bay WI FXFE-EGB 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABF Freight 110 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NPX 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 060-DNN 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE MaryMed, LLC - Hurlock 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tecta America East LLC - Baltimore 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE HBSHSEMD65 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&B Electric Co., Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bell Nursery - Store Employees 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SMD1 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Executive Maintenance, Inc. 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Center for Social Change 419 FTE
NAT-TCR OEM Tube Assemblies - Clarksville 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Northfield Store 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sonesta Select San Jose Airport 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR King's Ready Mix 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4308 - Holiday City Board Plant 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818 - Saginaw Concrete Plant 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 603 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Chicago, Alpha Coating Tech 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.