General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload · Virginia

Central Transport - 232

Richmond, VA · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Transport - 232 runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Transport - 232: 12.0 TCR = 267% of General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Transport - 232 safety composite

Central Transport - 232 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

Central Transport - 232 injury rate improved

Central Transport - 232's TCR fell 0.8 from 6.9 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 29.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=29.9 · 2022=13.2 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Richmond, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 267% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #62/68
  • PHOTO Kokomo 118
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kokomo 118 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Central Transport - 232 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Transport - 232 averages 12.0 TCR (267% of the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Transport - 232 TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=29.9 · 2022=13.2 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Transport - 232 falls in its industry

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long- establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 68 General Freight Trucking Long- employers in Virginia.

Central Transport - 232 (30 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Transport - 232
Central Transport - 232 (30 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Transport - 232 has fewer employees than the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance L median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2023 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2022 13.2 13.2 3 0 0
2021 29.9 29.9 3 0 0
2020 9.4 9.4 2 0 0
2016 6.9 6.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · VA · Richmond

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 939 employers in Richmond, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kokomo 118 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Baltimore MD FXFE-WBA 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holland - OW 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 213 PITTSBURGH 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NAES : Altavista Power Station 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northwest River Water Treatment Plant 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utilities - Wastewater Collections 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Class Contracting of Tidewater, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU Health System 14,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia Commonwealth University 11,826 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU 5,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR CJW Medical Center 3,259 FTE
NAT-TCR Signode Multi Wall - Taylor 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Knickerbocker Hotel 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ozark Steel LLC North 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Parks Maintenance Department 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 142 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4602 - Terre Haute Truss Plant 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4702 - Iron Ridge Truss Plant 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4718 - Iron Ridge Concrete Plant 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.