General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload · Florida

Central Transport - 330

Opa Locka, FL · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Transport - 330 runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload workplace, earning a grade B.

Central Transport - 330: 3.5 TCR = 78% of General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Transport - 330 safety composite

Central Transport - 330 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Central Transport - 330 held a steady TCR band

Central Transport - 330's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=15.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Opa Locka, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/96
  • PHOTO Central Transport - …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Central Transport - 581 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Central Transport - 330 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Transport - 330 averages 3.5 TCR (78% of the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Transport - 330 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=15.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Transport - 330 falls in its industry

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long- establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 96 General Freight Trucking Long- employers in Florida.

Central Transport - 330 (24 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Transport - 330
Central Transport - 330 (24 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Transport - 330 has fewer employees than the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance L median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 15.1 15.1 4 0 0
2021 9.2 9.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · FL · Opa Locka

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 27 employers in Opa Locka, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Central Transport - 581 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corbin/London KY FXFE-CRB 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 53-BINGHAMTON TERMINAL 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAY-ODFL 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stone Henge 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trulieve Calumet 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harplyn Inc 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE JW Turf Farms, Inc. 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROYAL PALM_1449534 1,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR 116812-ROYAL PALM FL P&DC 1,078 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MIA2 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Invincible Boat 298 FTE
NAT-TCR Muncy 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Trautman Lawn and Landscape 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakmont of Segovia 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Mechanical Contractors Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 392 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 497 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pegasus Concrete - Ypsilanti 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE D&H United Fueling Solutions, Inc 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.