General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload · Michigan

Central Transport - 480 480SH

Detroit, MI · ~123 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Transport - 480 480SH runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload workplace, earning a grade D.

Central Transport - 480 480SH: 6.2 TCR = 138% of General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Transport - 480 480SH safety composite

Central Transport - 480 480SH scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2024

Central Transport - 480 480SH injury rate improved

Central Transport - 480 480SH's TCR fell 3.6 from 9.9 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.9 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=4.6 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=8.0 · 2024=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 138% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #56/95
  • PHOTO Lafayette IN FXFE-LAF
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lafayette IN FXFE-LAF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Central Transport - 480 480SH in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Transport - 480 480SH averages 6.2 TCR (138% of the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Transport - 480 480SH TCR series: 2016=9.9 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=4.6 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=8 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Transport - 480 480SH falls in its industry

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long- establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 95 General Freight Trucking Long- employers in Michigan.

Central Transport - 480 480SH (123 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Transport - 480 480SH
Central Transport - 480 480SH (123 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Transport - 480 480SH has more employees than the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance L median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 6.3 9 0 0
2023 8.0 8.0 10 0 0
2022 8.7 8.7 9 0 0
2021 9.8 9.8 5 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 7 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2016 9.9 9.9 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · MI · Detroit

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lafayette IN FXFE-LAF 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omaha 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SLC Salt Lake City 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 006-MSP 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Konoa dba Vande Bunte Eggs 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Energy - Boyne 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elevated Technologies, Inc. 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper Three Rivers 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Hiva Inc 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 7366 - W North Ave N 2 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HCF of Findlay dba Fox Run Manor 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lovejoy Tool Company, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raleigh-Durham Nc - 210 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thai Summit Kentucky Corporation 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Luster Products, Inc 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Combustion Industries 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.