General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload · Texas

Central Transport - 780 780SH

Laredo, TX · ~22 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Transport - 780 780SH runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload workplace, earning a grade B.

Central Transport - 780 780SH: 3.2 TCR = 71% of General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Transport - 780 780SH safety composite

Central Transport - 780 780SH scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Transport - 780 780SH: 3.9 → 6.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.18× in 2024

Central Transport - 780 780SH's TCR rose 3.0 from 3.9 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Laredo, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 71% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #61/237
  • PHOTO 033-JAK
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 033-JAK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Central Transport - 780 780SH in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Transport - 780 780SH averages 3.2 TCR (71% of the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Transport - 780 780SH TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=7.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=6.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Transport - 780 780SH falls in its industry

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long- establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 237 General Freight Trucking Long- employers in Texas.

Central Transport - 780 780SH (22 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Transport - 780 780SH
Central Transport - 780 780SH (22 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Central Transport - 780 780SH has fewer employees than the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance L median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.6 7.6 2 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · TX · Laredo

3,020 General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Less Than Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 245 employers in Laredo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 033-JAK 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Bay WI FXFE-GRB 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BLG-ODFL 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kent 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matador Ranch 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wheeler Land & Livestock, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diamond B Feedyard, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luckey Custom Feedlot, Inc. 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Laredo 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Laredo 1,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-21080000-21080 748 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-62 672 FTE
NAT-TCR Summit Asphalt Plant 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Devon's Chocolates 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Panoramic LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SpringHill Suites Las Vegas Convention Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE SpringHill Suites Pittsburgh Monroeville 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Paper Converting Machinery 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Contract Electric Co., Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1147 Far86 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.