Messenger service · Illinois

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service

Hillside, IL · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Messenger service workplace, earning a grade A.

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service: 1.2 TCR = 28% of Messenger service BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service safety composite

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

85/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service held a steady TCR band

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=5.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Hillside, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/81
  • PHOTO Double R Deliveries …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Double R Deliveries LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service averages 1.2 TCR (28% of the Messenger service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service falls in its industry

1,452 Messenger service establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 81 Messenger service employers in Illinois.

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service (34 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service
Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service (34 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Central Zone Logistics LLC dba Chicago Messenger Service has fewer employees than the Messenger service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.0 2.5 0 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · IL · Hillside

1,452 Messenger service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 43 employers in Hillside, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Double R Deliveries LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RED 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR D&D Sexton Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FON 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cresco Labs - Kankakee 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendall Energy Facility 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adams Electric 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town of Normal - Water 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hillside 1 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5132-SEG1-5132 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 300 CRAIG PLACE 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hillside 2 289 FTE
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan North 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Roofing Corp - Menasha 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR VSoske, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SASCO 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wrens 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-895-Wavery TAC (RK-895) 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE IDF Studio Scenery 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vistar Maxima Supply - 1069 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.