Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material · Pennsylvania

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant

Mount Pleasant, PA · ~327 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material workplace, earning a grade A.

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant safety composite

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2018→2021

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant injury rate improved

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.6 in 2018 to 0.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322230 · Mount Pleasant, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #3/17
  • PHOTO Papercone
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~327 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Papercone (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant falls in its industry

122 Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stat establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 17 Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stat employers in Pennsylvania.

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant (327 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant
Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant (327 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant has more employees than the Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.7 0.3 2 0 0
2020 1.4 0.3 4 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2018 1.6 1.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322230 · PA · Mount Pleasant

122 Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 23 employers in Mount Pleasant, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Papercone 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACCO Brands - Sidney 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Envelope 1 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cenveo, CEM - Altoona 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ELZ 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&S Foods LLC 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building 1 & 2 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Streamlight, Inc. 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2611 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2611 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips RIMP 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Pleasant - 100 Distribution Circle 293 FTE
NAT-TCR HES Houston, TX,(North Belt Manufacturing) 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Graduate Cincinnati 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Spartech LLC - Salisbury 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Supply Chain : Muskegon, MI 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Akron Springside - 320 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lax - Dhl 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laminated Products Plant 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimbel Mechanical Systems, Inc 327 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.