Nursing homes · Minnesota

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake

White Bear Lake, MN · ~284 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake runs at 290% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake: 18.8 TCR = 290% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake safety composite

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake: 4.8 → 23.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 37.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2024

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake's TCR rose 18.9 from 4.8 in 2018 to 23.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 37.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · White Bear Lake, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 290% of ind

  • DART 21.5 DART
  • RANK #392/430
  • PHOTO Douglas Care Center
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~284 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Douglas Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake averages 18.8 TCR (290% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=31.7 · 2021=7.6 · 2023=37 · 2024=23.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #392 safest of 430 Nursing homes employers in Minnesota.

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake (284 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake
Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake (284 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cerenity Senior Care White Bear Lake has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 23.7 21.5 6 27 0
2023 37.0 35.5 4 46 0
2021 7.6 7.0 5 7 0
2020 31.7 29.8 7 59 0
2019 8.1 5.1 12 4 0
2018 4.8 3.2 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · White Bear Lake

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 88 employers in White Bear Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Douglas Care Center 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JBNC, Inc. dba Ridgecrest Health and Rehabilitation 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Union Care Center 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gowrie SNF Operator LLC 18.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFA-ST PAUL BEV-MAPLEWOOD MN 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwing America, Inc. 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sportech, Inc - Building Two 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE DecoPac, Inc. 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Bear Lake Area Schools 1,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carlson Building Maintenance, Inc. 693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carlson Building Maintenance Corporate Office 667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Century College 557 FTE
NAT-TCR Whitesburg ARH 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nvfal - Fallon Center 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Douglas Care Center 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Farm & Home Supply Springfield West 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain West Jefferson NC 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buzick Construction 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alohilani Resort Waikiki Beach 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Justrite Manufacturing 284 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.