Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Oregon

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc.

Portland, OR · ~131 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 123% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. safety composite

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc.: 2.4 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2023

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.4 from 2.4 in 2022 to 2.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.6 · 123% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #7/18
  • PHOTO NVB Equipment
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NVB Equipment (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (123% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. TCR series: 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.8 · BLS 2.1

Where CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 18 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Oregon.

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. (131 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc.
CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. (131 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

CH Murphy||Clark-Ullman, Inc. has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.8 1.4 4 0 0
2022 2.4 0.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · OR · Portland

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NVB Equipment 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lebanon Power & Apparatus Company, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Markem-Imaje Corporation - Field Operations 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commerce City Rents 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morgan Millwright Services 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Inc. - Portland, OR 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Standard Bag Mfg. Company 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vision Plastics, inc. 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Superior ROW Services, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hudson Valley Rehabilitation & Extended Care Center 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Geneseo 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HSTNTX07 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4223-M1200 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4223-M6400 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunrise Southwest Rockford 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO - St Louis - 8900 Page Ave - Dr Pepper/Seven-Up Manufacuring Company 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.