Building materials supply dealers · Massachusetts

Chace Building Supply

Foxboro, MA · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chace Building Supply runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building materials supply dealers workplace, earning a grade A.

Chace Building Supply: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Building materials supply dealers BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chace Building Supply safety composite

Chace Building Supply scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chace Building Supply: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 9× in 2024

Chace Building Supply's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444180 · Foxboro, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO R.P. Lumber Co. - St…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R.P. Lumber Co. - Staunton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Chace Building Supply in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chace Building Supply averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Building materials supply dealers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chace Building Supply TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.4

Where Chace Building Supply falls in its industry

280 Building materials supply deal establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Building materials supply deal employers in Massachusetts.

Chace Building Supply (31 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chace Building Supply
Chace Building Supply (31 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Chace Building Supply has fewer employees than the Building materials supply dealers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444180 · MA · Foxboro

280 Building materials supply dealers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 34 employers in Foxboro, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R.P. Lumber Co. - Staunton 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delaware OH Yard 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosenberg TX Yard 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central TX Sales Admin 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MILLBURY LEARNING CENTER-MA22 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE One Tech Circle 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raffles Unit 28C 40 Trinity Place 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biotech Builders Group 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillette Stadium 3,571 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Cocasset 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Neponset 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORTHEAST REG OFF (WHITE PLAINS NY) 263 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR thyssenkrupp System Engineering, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ticona Polymers, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Steel California Field 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foodway, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ogemaw County Road Commission 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minimus 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE George W Reagan Company 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.