Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Ohio

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2

Urbana, OH · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2: 4.1 TCR = 107% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 safety composite

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2023→2024

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 injury rate improved

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2's TCR fell 8.1 from 8.1 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=8.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Urbana, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 107% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #70/155
  • PHOTO Chandler ICF
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chandler ICF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 averages 4.1 TCR (107% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 TCR series: 2023=8.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 falls in its industry

2,261 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 155 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Ohio.

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 (30 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2
Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 (30 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Champaign Facility 2 Champaign Facility 2 has fewer employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.1 8.1 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · OH · Urbana

2,261 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 50 employers in Urbana, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chandler ICF 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ogden Office 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Arc Middlesex County 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHAMPAIGN FACILITY 1 CHAMPAIGN FACILITY 1 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tuente Farms Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm 3 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 6 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Hatchery 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rittal North America LLC 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelson Tree Service LLC 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell Aerospace - Urbana 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelson Tree Service, LLC 460 473 FTE
NAT-TCR Mipor - Port Huron 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ms200 - Ridgeland 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Springs Service Center 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Norcross Supply Co. 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Real Alloy Recycling, LLC - Wabash, IN 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clifton Park Installations, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ingram Barge Company Metropolis 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Polk 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.