Recyclable material collection services · Texas

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina

Celina, TX · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina runs at 380% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Recyclable material collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina: 9.9 TCR = 380% of Recyclable material collection services BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina safety composite

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.0

2016→2019

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina injury rate improved

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina's TCR fell 11.0 from 15.4 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.4 · 2019=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Celina, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 380% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #109/117
  • PHOTO ACI - San Ramon
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ACI - San Ramon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina averages 9.9 TCR (380% of the Recyclable material collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina TCR series: 2016=15.4 · 2019=4.4 · BLS 2.6

Where Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina falls in its industry

2,322 Recyclable material collection establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 117 Recyclable material collection employers in Texas.

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina (30 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina
Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina (30 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Champion Waste & Recycling Services- Celina has fewer employees than the Recyclable material collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2016 15.4 15.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · TX · Celina

2,322 Recyclable material collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 14 employers in Celina, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ACI - San Ramon 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S10182 - Shippensburg Hauling 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recology Service Center Coast 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Disposal Unsworth 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRAZOS RIVER SOD FARM 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feeders LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dimmitt Feedyard 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR GG&S Construction Company 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Settlers Ridge SNF Ops, LLC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Settlers Ridge SNF Ops, LLC D/B/A Settlers Ridge 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookshire's #073 93 FTE
NAT-TCR Okemo Mountain Resort 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmony Hall Nursing and Rehabilitation 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmony Hall Nursing and Rehab 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MTS Springfield/Riverton 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE K-Wood Truss Rafters, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anchor Marine 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittsford Lehigh 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE FiberPlus Federal Services, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.