Addition, alteration and renovation of single-family dwellings · Pennsylvania

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC

Pittsburgh, PA · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation of single-family dwellings workplace, earning a grade F.

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC: 8.3 TCR = 217% of Addition, alteration and renovation of single-family dwellings BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC safety composite

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.5

2016→2017

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC injury rate improved

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC's TCR fell 16.5 from 16.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.5 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.5 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 217% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/37
  • PHOTO OHI Construction
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OHI Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC averages 8.3 TCR (217% of the Addition, alteration and renovation of single-family dwellings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC TCR series: 2016=16.5 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC falls in its industry

698 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 37 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Pennsylvania.

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC (24 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC
Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC (24 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Champion Window Company of Pittsburgh, LLC has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation of s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 16.5 5.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · PA · Pittsburgh

698 Addition, alteration and renovation of single-family dwellings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OHI Construction 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stash Construction Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Day Improvements Corporate 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kelmann Restoration 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Avon Heights Mushrooms, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waynesburg PA 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Electric Power LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenaska Westmoreland Generating Station 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Norfolk (Vanor) 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ZF Chassis Systems-Chicago 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MSE Technologies, LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR B-X Centerville LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allied Mineral Products - Anniston 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE AEM 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ammon Nursery 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Inn & Suites 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.