Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Georgia

Champion Window of Atlanta

Atlanta, GA · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champion Window of Atlanta runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Champion Window of Atlanta: 7.3 TCR = 221% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champion Window of Atlanta safety composite

Champion Window of Atlanta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.7

2016→2024

Champion Window of Atlanta injury rate improved

Champion Window of Atlanta's TCR fell 10.7 from 13.1 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 221% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Barbour Plastics Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barbour Plastics Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Champion Window of Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champion Window of Atlanta averages 7.3 TCR (221% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champion Window of Atlanta TCR series: 2016=13.1 · 2017=0 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Champion Window of Atlanta falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Georgia.

Champion Window of Atlanta (74 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Champion Window of Atlanta
Champion Window of Atlanta (74 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Champion Window of Atlanta has more employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 13.6 9.7 7 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 13.1 9.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · GA · Atlanta

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barbour Plastics Inc 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interactive Life Forms, LLC 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkway Products Ft. Collins Colorado 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alliance Plastics Corp 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alma IQF Facility 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Guthrie, KY 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Hands Leasing 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pinkerton & Laws 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Roberts Roofing 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Weslaco Regional Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Distributing 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Georgia Manor Nursing Home 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meadowbrook at Appleton 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Colt's Plastics Company, Inc. 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zotefoams Inc 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kirila Contractors Inc. 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.