Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Indiana

Champion Window of Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~25 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champion Window of Indianapolis runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Champion Window of Indianapolis: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champion Window of Indianapolis safety composite

Champion Window of Indianapolis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Champion Window of Indianapolis: 0.0 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Champion Window of Indianapolis's TCR rose 5.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO Scandia Plastics/Pex…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scandia Plastics/Pexco LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Champion Window of Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champion Window of Indianapolis averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champion Window of Indianapolis TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2023=5.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Champion Window of Indianapolis falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Indiana.

Champion Window of Indianapolis (25 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Champion Window of Indianapolis
Champion Window of Indianapolis (25 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Champion Window of Indianapolis has fewer employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · IN · Indianapolis

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scandia Plastics/Pexco LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercury Plastics 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atkore Dallas 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR R15 APL - MENLO PARK 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vincennes Hatchery 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE U.S. Aggregates, Inc - Corporate 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE RWE Renewables Services LLC-Wildcat 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin (Pwr Del-IN) 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Brooks Co ISD* 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Mid-America Heartland : SVC-Des Moines IA-USA 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR California Contracting 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Electrical Workforce Solutions, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ion bond - Portsmouth 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Malta House 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mc Allen, Tx #00225 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Demsey Manufacturing Company, Inc. 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.