Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential · Arizona

Chandler Campus

Chandler, AZ · ~6,163 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chandler Campus runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Chandler Campus: 0.9 TCR = 24% of Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chandler Campus safety composite

Chandler Campus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chandler Campus held a steady TCR band

Chandler Campus's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Chandler, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #1/19
  • PHOTO 4238-332
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 163 inj
  • SIZE ~6,163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4238-332 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Chandler Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chandler Campus averages 0.9 TCR (24% of the Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chandler Campus TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1 · 2021=1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Chandler Campus falls in its industry

1,165 Alcoholism rehabilitation faci establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 19 Alcoholism rehabilitation faci employers in Arizona.

Chandler Campus (6,163 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Chandler Campus
Chandler Campus (6,163 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Chandler Campus has more employees than the Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (ex median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.2 18 33 0
2023 1.2 0.3 15 65 0
2022 1.7 0.6 31 80 0
2021 1.0 0.4 23 44 0
2020 1.0 0.3 20 40 0
2019 0.8 0.1 13 33 0
2018 0.6 0.1 10 25 0
2017 0.7 0.1 16 27 0
2016 0.6 0.2 17 21 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · AZ · Chandler

1,165 Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4238-332 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR K1001-KELB-ARMORY A KELBERMAN 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR R 1570 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Katy ABA 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
STATE-SIZE All Company 6,261 FTE
STATE-SIZE Total Company 5,907 FTE
STATE-SIZE Educational Services LLC 6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGSP-AZ23 2,419 FTE
NAT-TCR DOL008 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpha One 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chattanooga ASU 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Aerojet Rocketdyne - Redmond 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Loma Linda University Medical Center 6,167 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercedes Benz US. International 6,181 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.