Continuing care retirement communities · California

Channing House

Palo Alto, CA · ~172 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Channing House runs at 316% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Channing House: 12.0 TCR = 316% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Channing House safety composite

Channing House scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2021→2024

Channing House injury rate improved

Channing House's TCR fell 7.3 from 13.9 in 2021 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=13.9 · 2022=17.0 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Palo Alto, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 316% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #146/216
  • PHOTO Tucson Mather Manage…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tucson Mather Management, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Channing House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Channing House averages 12.0 TCR (316% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Channing House TCR series: 2021=13.9 · 2022=17 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Channing House falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #146 safest of 216 Continuing care retirement com employers in California.

Channing House (172 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Channing House
Channing House (172 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Channing House has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 6.5 8 0 0
2023 10.6 9.9 14 0 0
2022 17.0 17.0 16 0 0
2021 13.9 5.1 7 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Palo Alto

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 116 employers in Palo Alto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tucson Mather Management, LLC 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holstein Senior Living 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosewood Villa Assisted Living 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village Personal Care 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scarborough Farms 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berries 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mesa Harvesting Company 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sierra Pacific Industries Forestry 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stanford Health Care 16,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Palo Alto-Deer Creek-Office 1,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Varian, Palo Alto 1,396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10110) 1,227 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Phoenix B20 Police Dpt 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR K&M Tire Carter Lake, IA 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakefield Veterinary Group - 165 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Adrian Steel of Missouri 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - MCI 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Irwin Seating Company - Telescopic Division 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bracey's Mount Pocono Inc. 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency at Lansing West 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.