Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation · Texas

Chaparral Insulation

Waco, TX · ~346 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chaparral Insulation runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Chaparral Insulation: 1.1 TCR = 39% of Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chaparral Insulation safety composite

Chaparral Insulation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Chaparral Insulation injury rate improved

Chaparral Insulation's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Waco, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #27/97
  • PHOTO Cornerstone Services…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~346 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cornerstone Services Group LLC - Kansas City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Chaparral Insulation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chaparral Insulation averages 1.1 TCR (39% of the Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chaparral Insulation TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Chaparral Insulation falls in its industry

1,138 Insulation, boiler, duct and p establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 97 Insulation, boiler, duct and p employers in Texas.

Chaparral Insulation (346 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chaparral Insulation
Chaparral Insulation (346 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Chaparral Insulation has more employees than the Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, insta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 4 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2019 1.0 0.7 3 0 0
2018 2.2 1.5 6 0 0
2017 2.3 0.6 8 0 0
2016 1.9 1.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · TX · Waco

1,138 Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 314 employers in Waco, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Services Group LLC - Kansas City 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitsubishi Electric US Inc-22 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graber Construction 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alabama Operations 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Organizaiton 346 FTE
STATE-SIZE JAC 346 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wyman Gordon : Telge 346 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4818-TX07 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest 1,512 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - AUS3 1,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-TXWAC1 1,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3Harris AS IAS Waco 1,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Kuhns Markets Highwood 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lone Mountain Excavation and Utilities, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ACCO Brands - Sidney 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pecan Park RPC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Ritz-Carlton, New Orleans 346 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimberly Clark Corp. Loudon 346 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Gabriel Site 346 FTE
NAT-SIZE Douglas Dynamics, aka Western Products 346 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.