Other Building Finishing Contractors · Arizona

Charles Court Construction, Inc.

Phoenix, AZ · ~31 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charles Court Construction, Inc. runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Building Finishing Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Charles Court Construction, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 31% of Other Building Finishing Contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charles Court Construction, Inc. safety composite

Charles Court Construction, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2022

Charles Court Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

Charles Court Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238390 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO F. L. CRANE & SONS M…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: F. L. CRANE & SONS METAL PANELS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Charles Court Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charles Court Construction, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (31% of the Other Building Finishing Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charles Court Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Charles Court Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

403 Other Building Finishing Contr establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Other Building Finishing Contr employers in Arizona.

Charles Court Construction, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Charles Court Construction, Inc.
Charles Court Construction, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Charles Court Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Other Building Finishing Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238390 · AZ · Phoenix

403 Other Building Finishing Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR F. L. CRANE & SONS METAL PANELS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR R & G Development Corporation 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SDR 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sumter Coatings 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Health For Life 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE RIGGINS FARMS LTD 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE LPSCO 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Angle Homes, Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Headquarters 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kreider Farms - Main Office / Welcome Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GlobalFoundries TGCM 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ASC - Seattle 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ingram Readymix, Inc.-Hockley #32 & 75 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brown trucking Company Lexington, NC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brown Trucking Company Bowling Green 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Porcelen Limited CT. LLC d/b/a Spec 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.