Housing, single-family, construction general contractors · Missouri

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company

St. Louis, MO · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Housing, single-family, construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company: 5.2 TCR = 137% of Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company safety composite

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company held a steady TCR band

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company's TCR held near 0.1 from 5.2 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 137% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #4/13
  • PHOTO Mistick Construction
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mistick Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company averages 5.2 TCR (137% of the Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company falls in its industry

976 Housing, single-family, constr establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 13 Housing, single-family, constr employers in Missouri.

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company (48 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company
Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company (48 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Charles F. Vatterott Construction Company has more employees than the Housing, single-family, construction gen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.2 3.4 2 1 0
2017 5.2 5.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · MO · St. Louis

976 Housing, single-family, construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mistick Construction 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NASH1-DWH-NASHVILLE 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keauhou Place 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big-D Dovetail 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Doe Run Company / Central Office 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worlds of Fun (Cedar Fair, LP, ET AL ID# 29-178536106-8) 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Road Runner Safety Services, Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE CECO Concrete Construction : St Louis 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR L&W APPAREL CO INC dba LEGACY ATHLETIC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rennes Health & Rehab Center-East 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DT, Service Center, TX 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 521 Plymouth Road, Ste 108 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Triad Ohio 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Design Manufacturing, LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #82 (Murray, UT) 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harsco Industrial IKG Garrett 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.