Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation

Millersburg, PA · ~66 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation: 1.9 TCR = 51% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation safety composite

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2022→2024

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation injury rate improved

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Millersburg, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/233
  • PHOTO Parkway Gardens
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parkway Gardens (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation averages 1.9 TCR (51% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation TCR series: 2022=3.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation (66 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation
Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation (66 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Millersburg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 13 employers in Millersburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parkway Gardens 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welcome Home Management Woodstone New Ulm 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale East Broad 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Encore at Champlin 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bream Orchards Inc 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donegal Egg 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE George E Ley Company 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE PG Mehoopany Site Construction 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Millersburg Main Campus 568 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific - Millersburg, PA 522 FTE
CITY-NEAR Premier at Susquehanna 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR MI Profiles 142 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale East Broad 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LH Industries 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kositch Enterprises, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CAR Greenhouse LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE GEL Orange City 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Contractors, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Team Fabricators LLC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fehrs 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.