Water well pump and well piping system installation · Nebraska

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co

Broken Bow, NE · ~27 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co runs at 695% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water well pump and well piping system installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co: 19.4 TCR = 695% of Water well pump and well piping system installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co safety composite

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co: 15.0 → 28.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 33.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.99× in 2024

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co's TCR rose 13.8 from 15.0 in 2020 to 28.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 33.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Broken Bow, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.4 · 695% of ind

  • DART 19.2 DART
  • RANK #16/17
  • PHOTO Trenton DPS
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trenton DPS (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charles Sargent Irrigation Co averages 19.4 TCR (695% of the Water well pump and well piping system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co TCR series: 2020=15 · 2021=11 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=33.8 · 2024=28.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Charles Sargent Irrigation Co falls in its industry

1,614 Water well pump and well pipin establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 17 Water well pump and well pipin employers in Nebraska.

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co (27 employees, TCR 19.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Charles Sargent Irrigation Co
Charles Sargent Irrigation Co (27 employees, TCR 19.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Charles Sargent Irrigation Co has fewer employees than the Water well pump and well piping system i median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 28.8 19.2 2 1 0
2023 33.8 11.3 3 0 0
2022 8.6 6.9 4 1 0
2021 11.0 5.5 6 0 0
2020 15.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · NE · Broken Bow

1,614 Water well pump and well piping system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 13 employers in Broken Bow, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trenton DPS 19.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Utility Repair and Adjustments Inc 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transportation Dept 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange County EWRF 18.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Worley Field Services at ADM Columbus 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103806 - NM Misc 2019 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Google NBF1A DCG Civil 23148009 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SHORCO, INC. 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Becton Dickinson 561 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Lot 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Melham Medical Center 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookestone View 85 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwest Welding and Manufacturing 19.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PSL-North Point Village 19.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Maintenance and Operations - Salem Bldg M 19.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Msgrv - Greenville 19.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Morikami Inc 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Old Shiloh Road 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Trailers of Ga. Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE R21 Telford PA 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.