Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · South Carolina

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC

Charleston, SC · ~35 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC: 0.8 TCR = 21% of Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC safety composite

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC's TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 4.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Charleston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/64
  • PHOTO Southside Medical Ce…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southside Medical Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC averages 0.8 TCR (21% of the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.8

Where Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC falls in its industry

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices ( establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 64 Gastroenterologists' offices ( employers in South Carolina.

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC (35 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC
Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC (35 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Charleston Endoscopy Center LLC has fewer employees than the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., cent median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · SC · Charleston

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southside Medical Center 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAINT VINCENT CONSULTANTS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gundersen - Decorah Clinic 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graves Gilbert Clinic - WKONA 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conway Service Center and Warehouse 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLORENCE DISTRICT OFFICE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Delivery Operations (Charleston) 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR CA-El Segundo 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 50084 - CAPSTONE UNFI Ridgefield WA 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hurst 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh, NC - Alwin Court 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cf Transport 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Standard Industrial Supply, Inc 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 40254 - CAPSTONE Home Depot Lathrop CA SDC 5363 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barro's Pizza, 25th Ave 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.