Distribution of natural gas · South Carolina

Charleston Gas Operations

Charleston, SC · ~78 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charleston Gas Operations runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of natural gas workplace, earning a grade C.

Charleston Gas Operations: 1.0 TCR = 81% of Distribution of natural gas BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charleston Gas Operations safety composite

Charleston Gas Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charleston Gas Operations: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2024

Charleston Gas Operations's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Charleston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.0 · 81% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO Three Mile Road Serv…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Three Mile Road Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charleston Gas Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charleston Gas Operations averages 1.0 TCR (81% of the Distribution of natural gas BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charleston Gas Operations TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Charleston Gas Operations falls in its industry

1,153 Distribution of natural gas establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Distribution of natural gas employers in South Carolina.

Charleston Gas Operations (78 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charleston Gas Operations
Charleston Gas Operations (78 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Charleston Gas Operations has more employees than the Distribution of natural gas median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · SC · Charleston

1,153 Distribution of natural gas employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Three Mile Road Service Center 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Gas Storage AIC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chattanooga Service Center 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWG CTRL AZ - ADMIN OFFICE 0042-FAC13 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Administration 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgetown County Water and Sewer District 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thompson Construction Group Inc Cross 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hood Construction Company, Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR Enginuity Communications Corporation 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CFFV 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meyer Contracting Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Technomark Inc 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nathan Hale School 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant OR 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharon Healthcare Woods 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metals USA - Gregor Technologies 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.