Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · North Carolina

Charlotte Sort Center -42

Charlotte, NC · ~1,691 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlotte Sort Center -42 runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Charlotte Sort Center -42: 3.0 TCR = 46% of Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlotte Sort Center -42 safety composite

Charlotte Sort Center -42 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charlotte Sort Center -42: 0.0 → 12.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 12.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.34× in 2020

Charlotte Sort Center -42's TCR rose 12.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 12.0 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 3.0 · 46% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #24/214
  • PHOTO 44109 Pacific Common…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~1,691 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 44109 Pacific Commons Blvd, Fremont, CA 94538 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charlotte Sort Center -42 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlotte Sort Center -42 averages 3.0 TCR (46% of the Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlotte Sort Center -42 TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=12 · BLS 6.5

Where Charlotte Sort Center -42 falls in its industry

6,679 Air courier services (except e establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 214 Air courier services (except e employers in North Carolina.

Charlotte Sort Center -42 (1,691 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlotte Sort Center -42
Charlotte Sort Center -42 (1,691 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Charlotte Sort Center -42 has more employees than the Air courier services (except establishme median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 12.0 4.0 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NC · Charlotte

6,679 Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 44109 Pacific Commons Blvd, Fremont, CA 94538 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DYY3 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MERIDIAN (MSMER) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3232 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE OrthoCarolina 1,693 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patheon Manufacturing Services, LLC 1,683 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gaston County Government 1,711 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0007-Atrium Health Pineville 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Chicago Marriott Suites Deerfield 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Missoula MA 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Equipment Company - GA 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Surgical Hospital 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbus 1,691 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta (Smyrna) 1,691 FTE
NAT-SIZE Akron 1,691 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taunton 1,691 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.