Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing · North Carolina

Charlotte Wilmar

Charlotte, NC · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlotte Wilmar runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Charlotte Wilmar: 3.8 TCR = 114% of Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlotte Wilmar safety composite

Charlotte Wilmar scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2017→2023

Charlotte Wilmar injury rate improved

Charlotte Wilmar's TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.1 · 2018=8.9 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #80/132
  • PHOTO Cortina Safety Produ…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cortina Safety Products Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charlotte Wilmar in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlotte Wilmar averages 3.8 TCR (114% of the Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlotte Wilmar TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2018=8.9 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Charlotte Wilmar falls in its industry

2,838 Dinnerware, plastics (except p establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 132 Dinnerware, plastics (except p employers in North Carolina.

Charlotte Wilmar (32 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlotte Wilmar
Charlotte Wilmar (32 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Charlotte Wilmar has fewer employees than the Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 8.9 3.8 7 0 0
2017 5.1 1.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NC · Charlotte

2,838 Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cortina Safety Products Group 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Master Plastics 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Latham, NY 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flambeau Middlefield 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.C. Smith Produce Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE LATHAMS NURSERY INC. - MONROE, NC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Curtis Contracting,Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FTWN NE Svc Ctr 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin & Cobey Construction Co., Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Peterson Ambulatory Surgical Center 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grocery Outlet of Roseburg 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Droplet Measurement 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 013 Grand Prairie, TX 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nddev - Devil'S Lake 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.