Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers · Virginia

Charlottesville

Charlottesville, VA · ~201 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlottesville runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Charlottesville: 4.1 TCR = 187% of Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlottesville safety composite

Charlottesville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2024

Charlottesville injury rate improved

Charlottesville's TCR fell 6.6 from 10.4 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.4 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424810 · Charlottesville, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 187% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO Quality Brands of Om…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~201 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Brands of Omaha (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Charlottesville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlottesville averages 4.1 TCR (187% of the Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlottesville TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2017=2 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Charlottesville falls in its industry

664 Beverages, alcoholic (except d establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Beverages, alcoholic (except d employers in Virginia.

Charlottesville (201 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlottesville
Charlottesville (201 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Charlottesville has more employees than the Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 10 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 5 0 0
2022 3.2 3.2 5 0 0
2021 7.8 5.2 7 5 1
2020 3.9 3.9 6 0 0
2019 2.5 1.9 3 1 0
2018 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 3 0 0
2016 10.4 8.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424810 · VA · Charlottesville

664 Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 269 employers in Charlottesville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Brands of Omaha 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waco Beverages 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coho Distributing LLC Yakima 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Beverage 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Graphic Packaging International 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cadence Inc. 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE MANHEIM FREDERICKSBURG 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1602 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia 11,898 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Of Virginia (209) Health System 10,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia Medical Center 8,738 FTE
CITY-NEAR UVA Medical Center 7,268 FTE
NAT-TCR Lansing Building Products - Knoxville TN 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Builder Design Center - UT 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pikeville Store 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Family Y 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE ShopRite Of Wayne # 217 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodburn 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCX Corporation 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE K. Hovnanian Companies Corporate Office 201 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.