Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) · Ohio

Chase Properties II, LTD

Beachwood, OH · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chase Properties II, LTD runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) workplace, earning a grade B.

Chase Properties II, LTD: 1.1 TCR = 79% of Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chase Properties II, LTD safety composite

Chase Properties II, LTD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chase Properties II, LTD held a steady TCR band

Chase Properties II, LTD's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531120 · Beachwood, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.1 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/11
  • PHOTO C.J. Segerstrom & Sons
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C.J. Segerstrom & Sons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Chase Properties II, LTD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chase Properties II, LTD averages 1.1 TCR (79% of the Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chase Properties II, LTD TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Chase Properties II, LTD falls in its industry

302 Lessors of nonresidential buil establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 11 Lessors of nonresidential buil employers in Ohio.

Chase Properties II, LTD (29 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chase Properties II, LTD
Chase Properties II, LTD (29 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Chase Properties II, LTD has fewer employees than the Lessors of nonresidential buildings (exc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531120 · OH · Beachwood

302 Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 61 employers in Beachwood, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C.J. Segerstrom & Sons 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 54011200--120 BROADWAY - BASE - SILVERS 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PITTSBURGH PA 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Display and Fixtures 4500 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Union City Facility 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Breeder Division Field Office 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plibrico Refractories LLC - Oak Hill 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanging Rock Energy Facility 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCAC Administrative Campus 1,672 FTE
CITY-NEAR CC Administrative Campus 1,345 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ahuja Medical Center 1,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tremco Roofing and Building Maintenance - Weatherproofing Technologies, Inc. 1,101 FTE
NAT-TCR HCI 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR American Senior Communities - HQ 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LakeLand Electrical Services 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express DFW West Hurst 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE #4- Newport Sand &Gravel Co., Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeWind One-Pass Trenching LLC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parker Commercial Storage & Distribution, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veris Inc. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.