Skilled nursing facilities · New Jersey

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center

Chatham, NJ · ~179 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center: 8.4 TCR = 129% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center safety composite

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2024

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center injury rate improved

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center's TCR fell 2.8 from 6.1 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 33.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.1 · 2020=33.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Chatham, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.4 · 129% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #218/370
  • PHOTO Mapleton Community H…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~179 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mapleton Community Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center averages 8.4 TCR (129% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center TCR series: 2017=6.1 · 2020=33.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #218 safest of 370 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New Jersey.

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center (179 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center
Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center (179 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 6.4 2.1 2 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 33.4 31.0 4 24 0
2017 6.1 3.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NJ · Chatham

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 13 employers in Chatham, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mapleton Community Home 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chapel Hill Nursing Center 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westminster Medical Investors LLC DBA Life Care Center of Westminster 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WellBridge of Romeo 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE US137: North Jersey 518 - SG 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCCB 1L06 MOORESTOWN NJ PRODUCTION 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Pharma Labs Inc. 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camfil -Riverdale, NJ 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shop Rite of Chatham 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chatham 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-03615 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0034-0034-03615 FAC-03615-CHATHAM-NJ 49 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Ridge Alz 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Houston Galleria 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Loews Ventana Canyon Resort 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CCA Ypsilanti 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ftw South Office 901 Altamesa Blvd 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Citibus 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal Studios Florida 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jabil Packaging Solutions 179 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.