Decorated glassware made from purchased glass · Pennsylvania

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division

Galeton, PA · ~17 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Decorated glassware made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade D.

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division: 6.4 TCR = 193% of Decorated glassware made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division safety composite

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division: 4.7 → 28.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 28.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.19× in 2022

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division's TCR rose 23.3 from 4.7 in 2016 to 28.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Galeton, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 14.0 DART
  • RANK #26/38
  • PHOTO Vitro Architectural …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vitro Architectural Glass (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division averages 6.4 TCR (193% of the Decorated glassware made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=28 · BLS 3.3

Where Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division falls in its industry

441 Decorated glassware made from establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 38 Decorated glassware made from employers in Pennsylvania.

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division (17 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division
Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division (17 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Chattanooga Labeling Systems - Galeton Division has fewer employees than the Decorated glassware made from purchased median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 28.0 14.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · PA · Galeton

441 Decorated glassware made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 5 employers in Galeton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vitro Architectural Glass 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Glass Products Halsted Street Plant 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR custom glass solutions, Fostoria 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCI - 228G 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bruce Mansfield Plant 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manheim Corporation 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Framework Technologies, Inc. 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lawruk Builders, Inc. 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMC Powder Metallurgy, Inc. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Catalus Corporation 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dry Kiln and Sawmill 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell Trucking Inc 35 FTE
NAT-TCR Goodwill Industries of Orange County Town Square 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Equipto Electronics 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 305166-Lnk-Main Office 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 167536-Streator Po 6.4 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.