Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Tennessee

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc.

Chattanooga, TN · ~80 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade C.

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc.: 3.5 TCR = 105% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. safety composite

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2018→2022

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.2 from 10.3 in 2018 to 5.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Chattanooga, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #36/52
  • PHOTO 3722_7105
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3722_7105 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2018=10.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 52 Offset printing (except books, employers in Tennessee.

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. (80 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc.
Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. (80 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Chattanooga Labeling Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.2 1.3 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.3 6.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · TN · Chattanooga

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3722_7105 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SF2 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adhesive Label Company Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAGGIO DATA FORMS 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Middle Tennessee Electric (Williamson County Office) 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hardaway Construction Corp 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christman Southeast Constructors, LLC - Knoxville 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Location 1 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Information Technology / Communications 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Adhesive Label Company Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0234 Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp. - Clinton 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Omaha Steaks 96th St 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG463 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0522 Pilgrim's Pride - De Queen 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Good Samaritan Society - Scandia Village 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.