Community health centers and clinics, outpatient · Texas

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic

Lubbock, TX · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Community health centers and clinics, outpatient workplace, earning a grade F.

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic: 9.5 TCR = 249% of Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic safety composite

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2018

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic injury rate improved

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic's TCR fell 4.4 from 11.7 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.7 · 2018=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Lubbock, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 249% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/21
  • PHOTO City Heights FHC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City Heights FHC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic averages 9.5 TCR (249% of the Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic TCR series: 2016=11.7 · 2018=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic falls in its industry

599 Community health centers and c establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 21 Community health centers and c employers in Texas.

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic (24 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic
CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic (24 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

CHCL Arnett Benson Medical and Dental Clinic has fewer employees than the Community health centers and clinics, ou median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 7.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 11.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · TX · Lubbock

599 Community health centers and clinics, outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 482 employers in Lubbock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City Heights FHC 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Courage Center 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Outpatient Services (30833) 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Detroit Northwest 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Sales 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springlake Dairy LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineywoods Farm 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darty Gin Inc 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR A01 Covenant Medical Center 3,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-20049000 2,269 FTE
CITY-NEAR FALCON HEALTHCARE INC DBA INTERIM HEALTHCARE 2,046 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covenant Health System 1,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Beavercreek Residence Inn 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Suiza - Chester 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Romulus ARC 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison (Wimad) 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pheonix CPC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE SpringHill Suites Thatcher 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coney Island Site 1824 Houses 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lexington Meter Department 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.