Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Georgia

Cheffhil LLC

Atlanta, GA · ~69 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cheffhil LLC runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Cheffhil LLC: 8.1 TCR = 125% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cheffhil LLC safety composite

Cheffhil LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2023→2024

Cheffhil LLC injury rate improved

Cheffhil LLC's TCR fell 8.4 from 12.3 in 2023 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=12.3 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.1 · 125% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #109/210
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - HNY1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Cheffhil LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cheffhil LLC averages 8.1 TCR (125% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cheffhil LLC TCR series: 2023=12.3 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Cheffhil LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 210 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Georgia.

Cheffhil LLC (69 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Cheffhil LLC
Cheffhil LLC (69 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Cheffhil LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2023 12.3 12.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · GA · Atlanta

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HNY1 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 5159 NE CORNFOOT RD 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLINTON (OKCLI) 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ELM GROVE (WIELM) 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NW Metro Regional Business Center 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Glass and Mirror - Decatur 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCCOR - Woodstock - Corporate 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE M-Communication LLC 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Magic Plastics 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ontario Mills 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Flanders Provision Company LLC 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 0CR98 Foretravel INC 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stagnaro Distributing Inc 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonata Coconut Creek 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Health - Porter 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Knox 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.