Skilled nursing facilities · Georgia

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation

Dahlonega, GA · ~70 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation: 8.6 TCR = 132% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation: 0.0 → 65.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3069.7 TCR · DART/TCR 7.65× in 2023

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation's TCR rose 65.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 65.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3069.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 7.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Dahlonega, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 132% of ind

  • DART 65.4 DART
  • RANK #143/259
  • PHOTO TXKNC, Inc. dba Bail…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TXKNC, Inc. dba Bailey Creek Health & Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation averages 8.6 TCR (132% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=6 · 2019=13.2 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=3069.7 · 2023=65.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #143 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Georgia.

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation (70 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation
Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation (70 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Chelsey Park Health and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 65.4 65.4 3 29 0
2022 3069.7 3069.7 0 13 0
2021 15.3 15.3 1 6 0
2019 13.2 13.2 5 0 0
2018 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2017 8.2 8.2 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Dahlonega

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 28 employers in Dahlonega, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TXKNC, Inc. dba Bailey Creek Health & Rehab 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashley House BP-1 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harmony River 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sapphire Nursing at Meadow hill 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plains Logging Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC Gwinnett RBC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE GS Construction Inc 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jerry L. Johnson & Associates 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2513 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2513 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koyo Bearings North America - Dahlonega Plant 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4021-500089300 190 FTE
NAT-TCR Smithport Cabinetry Partners 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0162 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ludlow Construction Co Inc 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100657 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Food 4 Less - March Lane 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-028-Angola ( RK-028 ) 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-031-Martinsville ( RK-031 ) 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE M2 Chandler Tenant LLC 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.