Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Texas

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA)

Lubbock, TX · ~26 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA): 1.9 TCR = 58% of Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) safety composite

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2021

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) injury rate improved

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA)'s TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Lubbock, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/69
  • PHOTO UPF GRANDVIEW, LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UPF GRANDVIEW, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) falls in its industry

952 Skids and pallets, wood or woo establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 69 Skids and pallets, wood or woo employers in Texas.

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) (26 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA)
CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) (26 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

CHEP Lubbock Service Center (USXA) has fewer employees than the Skids and pallets, wood or wood and meta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.1 4.1 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · TX · Lubbock

952 Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 482 employers in Lubbock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UPF GRANDVIEW, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wood-N-Wood Products of California Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transpak - DIV 021 IPC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Industries, Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Belding Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friona Industries, L.P. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keeling Cattle Feeders 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Descanso Dairy, LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR A01 Covenant Medical Center 3,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-20049000 2,269 FTE
CITY-NEAR FALCON HEALTHCARE INC DBA INTERIM HEALTHCARE 2,046 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covenant Health System 1,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Goodwill Moundsville 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AWPI-Marble 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Harbor Freight Tools Corporate Calabasas 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 520-Naples 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Lancaster 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoosier Magnetics 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 03-14-02 South Div - Carolinas Region 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern States Buckhannon Coop. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.