Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment · Michigan

Cherry Health

Grand Rapids, MI · ~831 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cherry Health runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment workplace, earning a grade F.

Cherry Health: 10.2 TCR = 268% of Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cherry Health safety composite

Cherry Health scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2018→2023

Cherry Health injury rate improved

Cherry Health's TCR fell 2.4 from 4.0 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 30.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=30.3 · 2021=4.9 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 268% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #85/91
  • PHOTO Sansum Clinic Lompoc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 76 inj
  • SIZE ~831 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sansum Clinic Lompoc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Cherry Health in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cherry Health averages 10.2 TCR (268% of the Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cherry Health TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=30.3 · 2021=4.9 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Cherry Health falls in its industry

599 Clinics/centers of health prac establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 91 Clinics/centers of health prac employers in Michigan.

Cherry Health (831 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cherry Health
Cherry Health (831 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Cherry Health has more employees than the Clinics/centers of health practitioners median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.8 10 0 0
2021 4.9 0.6 15 17 0
2019 30.3 1.4 22 0 0
2018 4.0 1.0 29 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · MI · Grand Rapids

599 Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sansum Clinic Lompoc 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Harlem Council for Human Services, Inc. 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Catherine's Health Center Streams 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuma Regional Medical Center Specialty Clinics 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dearborn 831 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amway Grand Plaza Hotel 831 FTE
STATE-SIZE Munson Healthcare 830 FTE
STATE-SIZE McLaren Lapeer Region 832 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Gateway Building Systems Inc of ND 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5251 - Windsor 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Fiber LLC 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #987 (ALBERTSONS MARKET) 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Illinois (I6) 831 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buena Park Ca 831 FTE
NAT-SIZE UCare Minnesota - 600 831 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-Aa-Sfo-San Francisco-Sfo-Trml 831 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.