Demolition contractor · Texas

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition

Houston, TX · ~77 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Demolition contractor workplace, earning a grade A.

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Demolition contractor BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition safety composite

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/147
  • PHOTO ESLICH WRECKING COMP…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ESLICH WRECKING COMPANY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Demolition contractor BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=1 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.6 · 2022=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition falls in its industry

1,750 Demolition contractor establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 147 Demolition contractor employers in Texas.

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition (77 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition
Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition (77 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Cherry Moving Company, Inc. Dba Cherry Demolition has more employees than the Demolition contractor median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.9 0.0 0 1 0
2020 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · TX · Houston

1,750 Demolition contractor employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ESLICH WRECKING COMPANY 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gantt's Excavating and Contracting, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TIGER CONTRACTING, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BluRoc LLC. 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE FLOYDADA COOP GIN 2 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holman Well Service 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodlands Service Center 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Huntsville 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Silver Star Brands Administrative Office 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ACBL - Harahan 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Iron Woman Construction & Environmental Services LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE AccuRounds 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ampacet Deridder 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0129 Tyson Foods Inc. - Madison 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0560 Tyson Foods Inc. - Goodlettsville 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.