Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Virginia

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc

Chester, VA · ~129 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc: 8.0 TCR = 123% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc safety composite

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc: 8.1 → 12.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 12.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2021

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc's TCR rose 4.3 from 8.1 in 2016 to 12.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Chester, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.0 · 123% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #218/343
  • PHOTO Palm Garden of Ocala…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Palm Garden of Ocala, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc averages 8.0 TCR (123% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=9 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=12.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #218 safest of 343 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Virginia.

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc (129 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc
Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc (129 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Chesterfield Healthcare Group, Inc has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.5 8.9 7 0 0
2020 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2019 6.7 6.7 6 0 0
2018 9.0 7.9 8 0 0
2017 9.3 8.2 8 0 0
2016 8.1 3.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · VA · Chester

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 119 employers in Chester, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Palm Garden of Ocala, LLC 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Toledo 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHELSEA PLACE CARE CENTER LLC 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHAKER GARDENS 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE USA VA Norfolk 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Simmons Fredericksburg 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Don Beyer Motors, Inc 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : RIC2 3,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RIC2 2,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR C.W. Wright Construction Company, LLC 697 FTE
CITY-NEAR CW Wright Construction 573 FTE
NAT-TCR Air To Ground Services, Inc.-LA 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR J J Cardosi Inc 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MBK - Seven Lakes 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Anderson Lumber 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pacific Hills Manor 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Flavor Farms 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madico - Pinellas Park 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Manor - Pana #129 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.