Nursing homes · New York

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Oneonta, NY · ~157 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center: 10.8 TCR = 166% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center safety composite

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2023→2024

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center injury rate improved

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's TCR fell 5.6 from 13.6 in 2023 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=13.6 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Oneonta, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.8 · 166% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #479/616
  • PHOTO Discovery Village at…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~157 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Discovery Village at Tampa Palms (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center averages 10.8 TCR (166% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center TCR series: 2023=13.6 · 2024=8 · BLS 6.5

Where Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #479 safest of 616 Nursing homes employers in New York.

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center (157 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center (157 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Chestnut Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 6.4 5 0 0
2023 13.6 10.6 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Oneonta

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 91 employers in Oneonta, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Discovery Village at Tampa Palms 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morgan Hill Healthcare Center 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Greylock Extended Care Facility 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WESTERN HORIZONS LIVING CENTERS 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rye Service Center 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE FSE Hudson Yards 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Mechanical Services, Inc. 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rosina Food Products - Clinton 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR A.O. Fox Memorial Hospital 898 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital 843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springbrook NY Inc - SDS Plans 900, 910, 916, 636 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT OAS AT SUNY ONEONTA-WILLSBACH 340 FTE
NAT-TCR Banner Churchill Community Hospital 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Legend Cabinetry LLC 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheraton Chicago Northbrook 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Tower Crane Service, Inc 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Community Foundations 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon Staff Company 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgeview Center 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vinyl Kraft Acquisition 157 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.