Polyethylene resins manufacturing · Texas

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant

Orange, TX · ~163 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Polyethylene resins manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Polyethylene resins manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant safety composite

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant: 0.6 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Orange, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #47/76
  • PHOTO Saint-Gobain Perform…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Polyethylene resins manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant falls in its industry

644 Polyethylene resins manufactur establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 76 Polyethylene resins manufactur employers in Texas.

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant (163 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant
Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant (163 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. - Orange Plant has more employees than the Polyethylene resins manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · TX · Orange

644 Polyethylene resins manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 83 employers in Orange, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westlake Epoxy Bedford Park (Argo) Illinois 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arkema Inc. Louisville Plant 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integra-Biosciences Friars 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE RiceTec Alvin Research Station 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeport LNG Development LP 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Grove Steam Electric Station 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pattern Energy Group LP 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Dow Chemical Company - Orange, Texas 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper Orange Mill 484 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duphil Corporate Office 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Golden Triangle Polymers 328 FTE
NAT-TCR Allstate Power Vac Inc. - Brooklyn Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Grid Solutions : GA - ANA- Anasco, PR, USA 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HCS Rochester Hills MI 90-64-68-11 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Outlet 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trig's Eagle River 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE LA N Myers 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rock Hill Center (Scroc) 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaverton Center (Orbea) 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.