General warehousing and storage · South Carolina

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility

Loris, SC · ~133 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade B.

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility: 3.8 TCR = 66% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility safety composite

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility: 2.2 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.72× in 2023

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility's TCR rose 7.0 from 2.2 in 2016 to 9.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Loris, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.8 · 66% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #101/160
  • PHOTO Dean Warehouse Servi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dean Warehouse Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility averages 3.8 TCR (66% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=5 · 2019=4 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.2 · 2023=9.2 · BLS 5.8

Where CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #101 safest of 160 General warehousing and storag employers in South Carolina.

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility (133 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility
CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility (133 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

CHF Industries, Inc. - Distribution Facility has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.2 6.6 7 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2019 4.0 2.7 6 0 0
2018 5.0 4.5 10 0 0
2017 3.6 3.1 7 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · Loris

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 18 employers in Loris, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dean Warehouse Services, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MEM2 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR APL Logistics 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder Location 00619 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Roller Bearing Company of America - Hartsville Plant 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metglas, Inc. 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wabtec Global Services-SRC 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCall's Supply, Inc 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLEOD-LORIS COMMUNITY HOSP 449 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLeod Health Loris 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loris Rehab and Nursing Center 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coastal Carolina Truss 93 FTE
NAT-TCR Peterson Mechanical Inc 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites Mobile AL 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR J.F. Burns Machine Co., Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Koch Foods 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moveero Armstrong Iowa 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owen Electric Cooperative 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bosch Security Systems 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint-Gobain Abrasives 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.