Machine shops · Illinois

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company

Melrose Park, IL · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Machine shops workplace, earning a grade D.

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company: 5.9 TCR = 180% of Machine shops BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company safety composite

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.5

2016→2024

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company injury rate improved

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company's TCR fell 9.5 from 13.4 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.4 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=14.9 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332710 · Melrose Park, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 180% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #82/103
  • PHOTO All Quality Machinin…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: All Quality Machining and Finishing - Smoketown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chicago Grinding and Machine Company averages 5.9 TCR (180% of the Machine shops BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company TCR series: 2016=13.4 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=14.9 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Chicago Grinding and Machine Company falls in its industry

1,821 Machine shops establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 103 Machine shops employers in Illinois.

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company (30 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chicago Grinding and Machine Company
Chicago Grinding and Machine Company (30 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Chicago Grinding and Machine Company has fewer employees than the Machine shops median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2021 14.9 11.2 4 0 0
2020 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.8 2.6 3 0 0
2016 13.4 10.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332710 · IL · Melrose Park

1,821 Machine shops employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 96 employers in Melrose Park, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR All Quality Machining and Finishing - Smoketown 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kenwell Corporation 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mike's Micro Parts, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TMCO 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Odell Fire 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Northern N - IL Common Ops 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chicago Loop Tech 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spoon River Electric Cooperative, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jewel Distribution DC 1,169 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0032-0032-06651 FAC-06651-MELROSE PARK-IL 1,106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gottlieb Memorial Hospital 923 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC - Ruby Street Plant 714 FTE
NAT-TCR Mowrey Elevator Company, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oktibbeha County Co-op 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Howard Lumber Company 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Drug Plastics and Glass Co., Inc. - Elysburg, PA 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store #59 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30202-Capstone Assoc. Grocers of Baton Rouge 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laminations Northwest 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE H & R Agripower - Columbus 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.