Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) · Illinois

Chicago Protective Apparel

Skokie, IL · ~111 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chicago Protective Apparel runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) workplace, earning a grade C.

Chicago Protective Apparel: 3.1 TCR = 93% of Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chicago Protective Apparel safety composite

Chicago Protective Apparel scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chicago Protective Apparel: 1.0 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.29× in 2019

Chicago Protective Apparel's TCR rose 5.2 from 1.0 in 2017 to 6.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 315990 · Skokie, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Sayre Enterprises
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sayre Enterprises (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Chicago Protective Apparel in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chicago Protective Apparel averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chicago Protective Apparel TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=6.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Chicago Protective Apparel falls in its industry

62 Apparel findings and trimmings establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Apparel findings and trimmings employers in Illinois.

Chicago Protective Apparel (111 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Chicago Protective Apparel
Chicago Protective Apparel (111 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Chicago Protective Apparel has more employees than the Apparel findings and trimmings cut and s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.3 0.9 7 0 0
2018 1.9 0.0 2 0 0
2017 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

315990 · IL · Skokie

62 Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 117 employers in Skokie, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sayre Enterprises 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Showa Best Glove 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Tillman Company (DBA Tillman Compton) 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Badger Sportswear 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Powerton Station 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Bellwood Reporting Center 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contegra Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stenstrom Excavation and Blacktop Group 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal-Mogul Corporation 1,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR Skokie Campus 1,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal Mogul 1,123 FTE
CITY-NEAR SKOKIE HOSPITAL 992 FTE
NAT-TCR Water Administration Building 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kaman's Art Shoppes, Inc. KD 73 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Talladega Hatchery 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chromalox Inc. - Lavergne 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arlingtion Distribution Center 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feld Entertainment - MUL 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Struktol Company of America, LLC 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Closures, Inc. 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.