Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) · Illinois

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center

Chicago, IL · ~268 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
32.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center runs at 862% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) workplace, earning a grade F.

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center: 32.8 TCR = 862% of Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center safety composite

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 32.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 32.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center: 32.8 → 68.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 85.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.1× in 2023

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center's TCR rose 36.1 from 32.8 in 2021 to 68.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 85.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 2.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622210 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 32.8 · 862% of ind

  • DART 68.8 DART
  • RANK #21/21
  • PHOTO Princeton Plaza
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 133 inj
  • SIZE ~268 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Princeton Plaza (2.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chicago-Read Mental Health Center averages 32.8 TCR (862% of the Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center TCR series: 2021=32.8 · 2022=85.6 · 2023=68.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Chicago-Read Mental Health Center falls in its industry

872 Psychiatric hospitals (except establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 21 Psychiatric hospitals (except employers in Illinois.

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center (268 employees, TCR 32.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 6.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Chicago-Read Mental Health Center
Chicago-Read Mental Health Center (268 employees, TCR 32.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 6.7

Chicago-Read Mental Health Center has more employees than the Psychiatric hospitals (except convalesce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 68.8 68.8 47 0 0
2022 85.6 74.9 64 0 0
2021 32.8 32.8 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622210 · IL · Chicago

872 Psychiatric hospitals (except convalescent) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Princeton Plaza 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kassab Plaza 29.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health Services 27.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KidsPeace Hospital 27.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nexus Indian Oaks Family Healing 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASM Global - Peoria Civic Center 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village of Addison 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buck Services 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EWR - Ground Ops 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lansdale Area Family YMCA 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olympic Tug & Barge, Inc 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE RefleXion Medical, Inc 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Genesis Private Security 268 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.