Aluminum die-casting foundries · Illinois

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc

Bensenville, IL · ~242 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aluminum die-casting foundries workplace, earning a grade D.

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc: 4.6 TCR = 140% of Aluminum die-casting foundries BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc safety composite

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2016→2024

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc injury rate improved

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc's TCR fell 7.3 from 8.5 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331523 · Bensenville, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 140% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #8/17
  • PHOTO AFL Bristol
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~242 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AFL Bristol (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chicago White Metal Casting Inc averages 4.6 TCR (140% of the Aluminum die-casting foundries BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=8 · 2018=7 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Chicago White Metal Casting Inc falls in its industry

221 Aluminum die-casting foundries establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 17 Aluminum die-casting foundries employers in Illinois.

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc (242 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chicago White Metal Casting Inc
Chicago White Metal Casting Inc (242 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Chicago White Metal Casting Inc has more employees than the Aluminum die-casting foundries median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 3.4 2.7 7 2 0
2021 2.9 2.2 6 2 0
2020 3.6 3.2 8 0 0
2019 6.1 4.9 13 2 0
2018 7.0 4.5 19 1 0
2017 8.0 3.5 23 0 0
2016 8.5 3.0 27 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331523 · IL · Bensenville

221 Aluminum die-casting foundries employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 82 employers in Bensenville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AFL Bristol 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison-Kipp Corporation (South) 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spartan Light Metal Products LLC Mexico Mo 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OptiMIM LLC 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bell Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chemtool, Inc., Rockton North 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mt. Prospect 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midway Windows and Doors Inc. 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3Y US Foods Bensenville 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Chicago 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR ORD - Main facility 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Bensenville 366 FTE
NAT-TCR DC 47 - Riverside 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Dominic Jackson Memorial Hospital 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Steel Products, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Machining & Mfg., Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Refuse Materials, Inc. 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1336 - Houston South Main 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2882 - Katy North 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ergon, Inc. - Mirror Lake 242 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.